|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
| Moderated by: Saida.M, safetyblitz, Raven, Miss Brighter Days, LadyDay, Kunjufu, Kibibi, Happiness, Dillinger, Breadfruit, Backatya |
Topic closed |
|
| Author | |
|---|
RESS
Villager
Click here for your Black Profile
Search for Black Sites
|
Posted: Monday June 11th, 2007 09:41 |
|
City Law Firm LLP is used to keep the actual company anonymous. City Law Firm LLP - Racist Abuse and Exploitation
From: Derrick Lynch (raceequalitysecretservice@hotmail.co.uk)
Sent: 08 June 2007 11:56:51
To: City Law Firm City Law Firm LLP
London EC
Dear City Law Firm,
Thank you for the letter dated 7 June 2007, Ref: PLJS/FIK/7.1
This statement made by City Law Firm LLP is not correct.
I quote: "The allegations raised by you are very grave".
There have been no allegations whatsoever.
We are simply making an enquiry to find out facts about City Law Firm LLP. So far we appear to be having difficulty.
If City Law Firm LLP is not a White Supremacist Racist Terrorist Legal establishment then we would all expect that City Law Firm LLP would be proud of it's Race Equality/Diversity Scheme setting the standard for all in the Legal business.
It is also possible that City Law Firm LLP is a White Supremacist Racist Terrorist controlled Legal establishment infested with Racist staff working to support, maintain, promote and enforce Institutional Racism and the abuse of Black and non-white people.
Once again you mention the Commission for Racial Equality. We do not think it necessary to contact the CRE as it is still possible that City Law Firm LLP is not a White Supremacist Racist Terrorist controlled Legal establishment infested with Racist staff working to support, maintain, promote and enforce Institutional Racism and the abuse of Black and non-white people.
We cannot understand why details of the performance of the City Law Firm LLP Race Equality/Diversity Scheme should be classed as, and I quote: "sensitive and confidential information".
Race Equality/Diversity Scheme performance information is the kind of information that every Legal Service establishment should be proud to present openly unless, of course, that Legal Service establishment is a White Supremacist Racist Fascist Legal Service.
Please would you explain how it is that City Law Firm LLP justifies turning an enquiry into the performance of the Race Equality/Diversity Scheme into a case for harassment.
You mentioned the Police. If City Law Firm LLP choses to refer the matter to the Police then the Race Equality Secret Service is happy to work with them and others also.
The exposure of Institutionally Racist Legal organisations and the eradication of Racist Abuse and the exploitation of people classified as Black and non-white in the Legal Services is a matter of public interest.
We look forward to a positive response from City Law Firm LLP that would demonstrate that the City Law Firm LLP brand is one that can be trusted by Black and non-white people.
Kind regards
Derrick Lynch - Community Reporter
Maybe the moderators will allow this post to stay up this time.
____________________
Click here for your Black Profile
|
BNV Admin...
Administrator
| Joined: | Wednesday March 14th, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 66 |
| Photo: | |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |   |
Click here for your Black Profile
Search for Black Sites
|
Posted: Monday June 11th, 2007 11:46 |
|
| RESS....if you post stuff that is not verifiable naturally it will be removed by the team, the laws of slander and liable applies to this website...
____________________
www.blacksearch.co.uk - Helping to promote Black African and Caribbean Websites
|
MarcusGarveyLives
Villager
| Joined: | Tuesday April 6th, 2004 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 3588 |
| Photo: | |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |  |
Click here for your Black Profile
Search for Black Sites
|
Posted: Monday June 11th, 2007 18:36 |
|
BNV Admin... wrote Monday June 11th, 2007 12:46: RESS....if you post stuff that is not verifiable naturally it will be removed by the team, the laws of slander and liable applies to this website...
*****************************************
As a news and information service, what has the Blacknet site done to verify the allegations?
____________________
Click here for your Black Profile
|
RESS
Villager
Click here for your Black Profile
Search for Black Sites
|
Posted: Tuesday June 12th, 2007 10:17 |
|
Many organisations classified as Black are scared stiff of these White Supremacist Racist Terrorist Law organisations who are destroying the lives of millions of people classified as Black/non-white in a polite manner.
It time to put a stop to it.
I can understand why Blacknet is afraid so that is why I have removed the identity of the suspect White Supremacist Racist Terrorist Law firm.
Below is the previous corespondence.
From: raceequalitysecretservice@hotmail.co.uk
To: City Law Firm LLP
Subject: Ref: PLJS/FIK/13919.19
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 19:04:55 +0100
City Law Firm LLP
EC
Ref: PLJS/FIK/13919.19
Dear City Law Firm LLP,
I am a member of the RESS a community action group focused on the problem of Institutional Racism. We have received reports that Racism may have had an impact on the mismanagement of the case, illegal surveillance and serious abuse of Ms ? and her witnesses.
The reason I am writing is to try and obtain some facts about the ethos, performance and quality of the City Law Firm LLP Race Equality/Diversity Scheme. Hopefully the facts will be good news.
I have to deliver a report to the community network and need to have some very important questions answered.
If it is true that the problem of Institutional Racism which is White Supremacy exists in the City Law Firm LLP and this problem is not solved, Racists in Senior Management positions will sabotage and disrupt the work of non-racist staff. I think you would agree that in order to achieve balanced Legal Services, White Supremacist staff which are the same as Racist staff must be rooted out urgently.
Please would you send me the answer to these specific questions. Please would you ensure that no Racist staff answer these questions as White Supremacist, Racist Terrorist staff will try to lump all these questions together in an attempt to confuse the situation.
These White Supremacist, Racist Terrorists are responsible for the systematic abuse of the non-white community and are the cause of incompetent administration, stress in the work place, child abuse, misappropriation of funds, violent and unjustified arrests, premature deaths, Police corruption, domestic violence and gun crime on the streets.
1. Are any of the City Law Firm LLP departments Institutionally Racist which is the same as White Supremacist?
2. How many of the City Law Firm LLP Departments have the correct number of Black and Minority Ethnic staff in Commander, Inspector and Senior Management positions?
3. What checks are in place to ensure that staff in City Law Firm LLP Departments are not members of Racist organisations?
4. Please would you send me by post and email the latest performance results of the City Law Firm LLP Race Equality/Diversity Scheme.
5. Would you please send me the 16+1 Ethnic Classification of all City Law Firm LLP Senior Management.
I look forward to your reply so that I can communicate the answers to people in the community network.
Thank you in advance for your cooperation.
Yours in good faith and hope.
Derrick Lynch
Edmonton
London N9
Dear City Law Firm LLP,
Thank you for the letter dated 1 June 2007, Ref: NA/13919.19.
The way Ms ? has been handled to date appears that there has been a high level of clandestine exploitation and Racist activity against Ms ? which has caused us to suspect that City Law Firm LLP is a White Racist legal establishment supporting the abuse of people classified as Black as well as non-white people.
It is possible that City Law Firm LLP is not a White Racist legal establishment which would make it unnecessary to take this matter to the Commission for Racial Equality. This is why we have chosen to make an enquiry to find out the facts first.
Please would you arrange for answers to the questions sent previously to help us come to a positive conclusion to the matter as soon as possible for the benefit of all involved.
We hope that City Law Firm LLP takes the problem of Racist Abuse in the Legal services seriously.
This information is needed for our reports to the community network. We work hard to expose Racist Legal organisations and eradicate Racist Abuse and the exploitation of people classified as Black in the Legal Services.
We note in your letter that you state "at no time was there mismanagement of the case, illegal surveilance or serious abuse Ms ? or her witnesses" however we cannot accept that statement as factual because City Law Firm LLP remains a suspect Racist legal service in relation to the handing of Ms ? and her case.
Kind regards
Derrick Lynch - Community Reporter
Race Equality Secret Service
Edmonton
London N9
URGENT
To the case manager: Mrs ?
Civil Appeal Office
The Royal Courts of Justice
Strand
London WC2A 2LL
Court Case References: Re: ? v ? and 10 Others.
Dear Mrs ?,
Re: Transcript and Racism and Exploitation Enquiry.
I am contacting you on behalf of RESS (Race Equality Secret Service) a Community Action group working against Racist Abuse of non-white people.
We have had several serious reports regarding the above case and therefore have launched an urgent enquiry into the possibility of a high level of clandestine exploitation and Racist activity against Ms ? by City Law Firm LLP, the defendants, Court Staff and Judge ? in the attempt to unlawfully cover up and drop a meritous case.
We are aware that the case has been adjourned in order to obtain an accurate verbatim case transcript of what factually took place in the hearing before Mr. Justice ? on ?/? of June 2006 in which apparently it was shown that Ms ? had won the case and that it was agreed that the case could not be struck out.
We have been alerted to the fact that case transcript ordered by Ms ? was faulty in so much that it was not possible for the transcribers to produce a full accurate verbatim case transcript due to the fact the disc they were supplied with by court staff was of surprising very poor quality.
Therefore we suspect that the relevant information proving the true outcome of Ms ?’s success winning of her case at the hearings supported by her 9 bundles of evidence and 14 witnesses testimonies may have been corrupted as a result Racism. This matter in itself requires further investigation.
There is now a serious enquiry into Racist Abuse and Exploitation of Ms. ? and how her case has been handled. It is unreasonable to expect Ms ? to pay over £3000 for a corrupted transcript, and unfairly place this case onto the dismissal list on the basis that she has to pay for a transcript that cannot be used.
These reports are for the community network. We work hard to expose Racist Legal organisations and aim to eradicate Racist Abuse and the exploitation of people classified as Black in the Legal Services.
I trust that this case will not be unfairly placed onto the dismissal list under such serious circumstances whilst this enquiry is underway. Please find copies of enquiry documents attached.
Kind regards
Derrick Lynch - Community Reporter
Race Equality Secret Service
Edmonton
London N9
City Law Firm LLP
Fetter Lane
London EC
Dear City Law Firm LLP,
Thank you for the letter dated 7 June 2007, Ref: PLJS/FIK/7.1
This statement made by City Law Firm LLP is not correct.
I quote: "The allegations raised by you are very grave".
There have been no allegations whatsoever.
We are simply making an enquiry to find out facts about City Law Firm LLP. So far we appear to be having difficulty.
If City Law Firm LLP is not a White Supremacist Racist Terrorist Legal establishment then we would all expect that City Law Firm LLP would be proud of it's Race Equality/Diversity Scheme setting the standard for all in the Legal business.
It is also possible that City Law Firm LLPis a White Supremacist Racist Terrorist controlled Legal establishment infested with Racist staff working to support, maintain, promote and enforce Institutional Racism and the abuse of Black and non-white people.
Once again you mention the Commission for Racial Equality. We do not think it necessary to contact the CRE as it is still possible that City Law Firm LLP is not a White Supremacist Racist Terrorist controlled Legal establishment infested with Racist staff working to support, maintain, promote and enforce Institutional Racism and the abuse of Black and non-white people.
We cannot understand why details of the performance of the City Law Firm LLP Race Equality/Diversity Scheme should be classed as, and I quote: "sensitive and confidential information".
Race Equality/Diversity Scheme performance information is the kind of information that every Legal Service establishment should be proud to present openly unless, of course, that Legal Service establishment is a White Supremacist Racist Fascist Legal Service.
Please would you explain how it is that City Law Firm LLP justifies turning an enquiry into the performance of the Race Equality/Diversity Scheme into a case for harassment.
You mentioned the Police. If City Law Firm LLP choses to refer the matter to the Police then the Race Equality Secret Service is happy to work with them and others also.
The exposure of Institutionally Racist Legal organisations and the eradication of Racist Abuse and the exploitation of people classified as Black and non-white in the Legal Services is a matter of public interest.
We look forward to a positive response from City Law Firm LLP that would demonstrate that the City Law Firm LLP brand is one that can be trusted by Black and non-white people.
Kind regards
Derrick Lynch - Community Reporter
Race Equality Secret Service
Edmonton
London N9
Last edited on Tuesday June 12th, 2007 10:23 by RESS
____________________
www.blacksearch.co.uk - Helping to promote Black African and Caribbean Websites
|
RESS
Villager
Click here for your Black Profile
Search for Black Sites
|
Posted: Tuesday June 12th, 2007 10:37 |
|
| Hardcopy proof on request.
____________________
Click here for your Black Profile
|
BNV Admin...
Administrator
| Joined: | Wednesday March 14th, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 66 |
| Photo: | |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: | |
Click here for your Black Profile
Search for Black Sites
|
Posted: Tuesday June 12th, 2007 12:10 |
|
Ress: Points for your clarification....
1. BNV does not know you or your credentials, in fact it is fair to say that I am unaware whether you are black/white male or female. neither does this site know on what basis or connection you have to the person you are writing on behalf of.. On this basis alone I am not comfortable to allow you post without strict caviates..
2. Further without written authorisation from the person you proport to be advising, i'm sure you are aware that publishing facts concerning anybody's case without their express knowledge or consent, infringes the Data Protection Act 1998, and puts this site in a very difficult position.
3. The above two points withstanding, it is not my practice or that of BNV to allow any body to post partial facts as part of wider campaign, without being very clear about what has been alledged is in fact true. Given that this is your case, my expectation is that YOU provide the proof and sufficient evidence to underpin your claim. (to date I have seen none), on that note I do not call letters to any firm/public body making accusations, as proof anything, or sufficient to underpin the allegations YOU made.
4th point and this is from a personal view point, your line of approach, arguement is not only confused it is clearly a contradiction for you and your 'client'. for example if you suspect a firm is 'racist', I fail to understand or helpful, how you would then expect this same firm exclude a 'racist' from responding to your various questions.
first of all I doubt if any firm would acknowledge it had a racist employee, as this would be akin to a turkey voting for Xmas to be 365 days of the year, secondly if the firm is unwittenly 'racist' what expertise if any would that firm have to identify who is or is not a 'racist', therfore the whole question and exercise becomes silly and pointless.
Final point... again this is a personal view.. and I'm being brutally honest for the sake of clarity and nothing else... If your approach is to elicit information or evidence on which to later make a claim against this company, then in my view is unnecessarily antagonistic, rhetorical and amature.
If you're going to DEMAND information regarding a case from any firm or public body, then anybody with basic knowledge of the conditions of this country would know, that at the very least you must frame that request, with a signed written requested in line with the Data Protection Act 1998. (in that request you specify exactly what you want, you don't need to sermonise). If however you wanted information about their policies and procedures then a request framed under the freedom of Information Act 2000, (presuming of course that this is a public body) would have sufficed.
So my point is simple, our caution here at BNV has NOTHING to do with being 'affraid' and everything to do with you're lack of knowledge, expertise and confused campaign that appears to have no clear direction...
I hope now that this better clarified where the disjucture is between our actions and your behaviour...
____________________
www.blacksearch.co.uk - Helping to promote Black African and Caribbean Websites
|
RESS
Villager
Click here for your Black Profile
Search for Black Sites
|
Posted: Tuesday June 12th, 2007 12:42 |
|
BNV Admin... wrote:
1. BNV does not know you or your credentials, in fact it is fair to say that I am unaware whether you are black/white male or female. neither does this site know on what basis or connection you have to the person you are writing on behalf of.. On this basis alone I am not comfortable to allow you post without strict caviates..
No details will be posted.
The strategy and it's results will be made manifest.
2. Further without written authorisation from the person you proport to be advising, i'm sure you are aware that publishing facts concerning anybody's case without their express knowledge or consent, infringes the Data Protection Act 1998, and puts this site in a very difficult position.
Ms ? has given authorisation and would like her case publicised as much as possible as many others are suffering the same Racist abuse in silence.
3. The above two points withstanding, it is not my practice or that of BNV to allow any body to post partial facts as part of wider campaign, without being very clear about what has been alledged is in fact true. Given that this is your case, my expectation is that YOU provide the proof and sufficient evidence to underpin your claim. (to date I have seen none), on that note I do not call letters to any firm/public body making accusations, as proof anything, or sufficient to underpin the allegations YOU made.
No allegations have been made. You have fallen for a White Supremacist Racist mind trick.
This a result of White Supremacist Racist conditioning from childhood.
We come across this tactic all the time.
4th point and this is from a personal view point, your line of approach, arguement is not only confused it is clearly a contradiction for you and your 'client'. for example if you suspect a firm is 'racist', I fail to understand or helpful, how you would then expect this same firm exclude a 'racist' from responding to your various questions.
Excellent!
Good thinking.
First we must establish if the firm is Racist or not.
Correct?
first of all I doubt if any firm would acknowledge it had a racist employee, as this would be akin to a turkey voting for Xmas to be 365 days of the year, secondly if the firm is unwittenly 'racist' what expertise if any would that firm have to identify who is or is not a 'racist', therfore the whole question and exercise becomes silly and pointless.
Why would it become silly and pointless?
Can you not perceive and conceive the solution or has our White Supremacist Racist education given us a mind block?
Final point... again this is a personal view.. and I'm being brutally honest for the sake of clarity and nothing else... If your approach is to elicit information or evidence on which to later make a claim against this company, then in my view is unnecessarily antagonistic, rhetorical and amature.
Please expound with intelligence and clarity.
If you're going to DEMAND information regarding a case from any firm or public body, then anybody with basic knowledge of the conditions of this country would know, that at the very least you must frame that request, with a signed written requested in line with the Data Protection Act 1998. (in that request you specify exactly what you want, you don't need to sermonise). If however you wanted information about their policies and procedures then a request framed under the freedom of Information Act 2000, (presuming of course that this is a public body) would have sufficed.
Why would you believe there is not need to sermonise?
Do you feel ashamed for White Supremacist Racists like a house slave would feel ashamed for her masters exposure to civil rights activists?
So my point is simple, our caution here at BNV has NOTHING to do with being 'affraid' and everything to do with you're lack of knowledge, expertise and confused campaign that appears to have no clear direction...
I hope now that this better clarified where the disjucture is between our actions and your behaviour...
What do you know about White Supremacist ideology and the system of Institutional Racism?
Do you know how they work and how they impact on people classified as Black?
When one is afraid and ignorant one should admit that fear as the first stage.
Our White Supremacist Racist education taught us to believe whatever people classified as White might say. People classified as Black look stupid if they dare to question White Suprmacist Racists even when those Racist are abusing Black people infront of their eyes.
What do you think it was like for Black people to witness a Lynching?
Would they be thinking the way you are thinking?
Think about it.
____________________
Click here for your Black Profile
|
RESS
Villager
Click here for your Black Profile
Search for Black Sites
|
Posted: Tuesday June 12th, 2007 12:47 |
|
In general.
White Supremacist Racist conditioning from childhood makes us almost instinctively want to defend White people against exposure to the truth about their abuse of Black people.
How many times have you seen this in your life?
Never obviously if you are White.
____________________
www.blacksearch.co.uk - Helping to promote Black African and Caribbean Websites
|
BNV Admin...
Administrator
| Joined: | Wednesday March 14th, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 66 |
| Photo: | |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: | |
Click here for your Black Profile
Search for Black Sites
|
Posted: Tuesday June 12th, 2007 13:26 |
|
RESS: I have no intention in getting into an ongoing dialogue with you on this subject, so this will be my last word on this subject...
1. Without further details as who or what you are, anything you post that the Moderators feels contravines the ethos of this forum will be removed without further warning, sorry but that is how it has to be..
2. Unless you produce a pdf copy of notification from MS, that verfies MS, their address and contact details and your right to post details of her case,then I am absolutely not going to continue to allow you publicising this case anymore.. (for security you can of course PM that verification privately).
3. Now unless my ability to read has been severly compromised lately, it is very clear to this reader that you have more than made inferences, you have made clear allegations of malpractice based on 'racism', whether you acknowledge that you made an allegation is immaterial, the fact are that you have... on that basis unless you can prove these allegations then we (or more to the point YOU have a problem).
4. Further If you're going to establish a fact, then it is reasonable to put a specific circumstance/s giving times, dates and outcomes and ASK that person or firm to explain themselves properly, you did not do that, you aimed a rhetorical question and then invited the firm to incriminate themselves by agreeing with your view of events and your perception of the motivating factor. In any culture that is not behaviour aimed at establishing fact/s it called being accusatory..
5. If you're going to demand information then do so, BUT, I would make the obvious point that if indeed you are trying to be tactical in fishing for gaps in the firms practice and behaviour. then it is illogical to give away your game plan in the opening letter, the fact that you did this informs me that you are unlikely to succeed in whatever game you think you're playing with this firm.
Further far from feeling ashamed at your attempt/s (and i use the word 'attempt' loosely), to expose this firm. I am in fact struggling to see the relevance or the point of this execise? trying to prove a racist 'attitude' is impossible, I emphasise the word attitude as opposed to behaviour because there is a CLEAR distinction between the two words.
6. Finally my knowledge or views of 'white supremacy' is I put it to you totally irrellivant, what is relevant is the obvious fact that you're approach (based on what little i've seen) is flawed, the simple point is that racism is like rape..is very easy to alleged, but very hard to prove without specific examples and verification from witnesses to the event and the distress caused to the victim.
Sermonising that it is racism does not make it so, shouting from the rooftoops does not make it so...and sending sermonising letters definately will not make so...
____________________
Click here for your Black Profile
|
RESS
Villager
Click here for your Black Profile
Search for Black Sites
|
Posted: Tuesday June 12th, 2007 14:12 |
|
Ok, I'll ask Ms ? if she wants some PDF's done.
Will all forums member's be allowed to see the PDF's?
As regards your understanding of the strategy your conclusions are to expected when coming across such a new, untried and unique counter-racism fighting method of such magnitude.
Please enjoy you all have front row seats on this one.
Last edited on Tuesday June 12th, 2007 14:17 by RESS
____________________
www.blacksearch.co.uk - Helping to promote Black African and Caribbean Websites
|
BNV Admin...
Administrator
| Joined: | Wednesday March 14th, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 66 |
| Photo: | |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: | |
Click here for your Black Profile
Search for Black Sites
|
Posted: Tuesday June 12th, 2007 15:22 |
|
RESS: Verification of you're right to post MS details will not be shared with the forum, it purely to satify the Moderator team that you have the authority to share this person's details on this forum.
Until i recieve that verification I will lock this thread.
____________________
Click here for your Black Profile
|
BNV Admin...
Administrator
| Joined: | Wednesday March 14th, 2007 |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | 66 |
| Photo: | |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: | |
Click here for your Black Profile
Search for Black Sites
|
Posted: Thursday June 14th, 2007 20:52 |
|
RESS: I note that to date that you have failed to provide verification from MS, detailing that you have their express permission to post personal details on this site I am therefore giving notice that if I have not recieve the notification promised by you, then i will be removing this thread by tomorrows end.
____________________
www.blacksearch.co.uk - Helping to promote Black African and Caribbean Websites
|
|
|
Current time is 01:11 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Join the
Blacknet
mailing list
|
|
