|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
| Moderated by: Saida.M, safetyblitz, Raven, Miss Brighter Days, LadyDay, Kunjufu, Kibibi, Happiness, Dillinger, Breadfruit, Backatya |
|
|
| Author | |
|---|
Vubundada_Kandaba
Villager
Click here for your Black Profile
Search for Black Sites
|
Posted: Wednesday January 18th, 2006 09:08 |
|
Please don't shoot the messanjah!!!: Vubundada
Testicle size determines how faithful your man is
GETTING COSY: Men can be kept monogamous with strict rules
Time out for political campaigns. Let’s talk about the ball game. How I wish you could stop frowning and read this with adult discipline for, on its face value, it is an explosive topic. There is no way one can write about testicles without making some readers miss a heart-beat, but you can bring your Bible closer for inspiration as I take you to the source of female agony; the philandering man!
Generally, testicles are just another part of the male body. Only that, though seemingly hidden and insignificant, they rule this world! According to Allan and Barbara Pease’s Why Men Don’t Listen, Women Can’t Read Maps, there is a relationship between testicle size and assertiveness, faithfulness, honesty, life expectancy and self-esteem.
To begin with, right across the animal world, testes have no standard size. Take humans for instance, while some people have Olympic sizes, others barely have anything to talk of. And it is this size, relative to the owner’s overall body mass, that determines testosterone levels.
And scientists are beginning to agree that testicle size determines the male’s level of faithfulness or monogamy. Pease’s book mentions the African Bonobo chimpanzee, which has the largest testicles of all primates and has sex incessantly with every female. But the mighty gorilla, with his relatively small balls, would be lucky to have sex once a year, even though he has his own harem.
So, in terms of the testicle/body mass ratio, human males have balls that are an average size for primates. This means that men produce enough testosterone to encourage them to be promiscuous, but little enough to be kept monogamous with strict rules enforced by women, religion or the society in which they live. That the bigger the balls, the more difficult it is to manage faithfulness and the more important such safe guards like religion, court marshal and society become. Look at history: The time tested and guaranteed solution to the problem of male infidelity was castration. Slash them off and a man’s squinted eyes would straighten up. Not only would a man become monogamous, he wouldn’t have to shave much, he wouldn’t go bald and he would live longer.
Pease referred to studies of men in mental institutions which showed that castrated men live to an average age of 69, while men left intact with testosterone coursing through their bodies only live to 56 years. The same principle applies to your goat, sheep or cow. Actually, there is a mooted solution to the philandering urges of males that involved the altering of the balls. According to Nature Magazine, Drs Larry Young and Thomas Insel of Emory University in Atlanta carried out studies on two groups of rodents known as voles in 1999.
They used two types of vole: monogamous prairie voles and their polygamous cousins, the montane vole, which share 99% of the same genes. They took the gene called the vasopressin receptor gene, which plays a role in male behaviours, including aggression, communication, sexual activity, and social memory, from a monogamous vole testes and inserted it into the polygamous vole. They discovered that the polygamous vole ‘got saved’, abandoned its harem, formed closer relationships with specific females and behaved in many other monogamous ways. Maybe with time and more female prayers, such therapy may be handy and vital for men who have failed to fear HIV.
But there is also good news if we just do nothing. Evidence shows that our male ancestors had much larger balls than modern men and, compared to other primates, men produce significantly smaller amounts of sperm per gram of tissue than their gorilla or chimp cousins. Testicle size and sperm production have been steadily decreasing for generations. That means we can expect future generations of men to be much less potent than modern men.
Pease’s book records proof that the average sperm count of men is now approximately half that of men in the 1940s. As we produce males who are less masculine than their grandfathers, infidelity will lose its backbone and the kingdom of monogamy will come. I just hope we shall have men who are men enough to invade the Congo if our enemies are cited there. For aggressiveness, level of risk, determination and the urge to rule over others are all products of ball size.
That is why it makes sense for political aspirants like Museveni, Besigye, Sebaana and Bwanika to be more-than-averagely endowed, although I haven’t actually got close enough to check. It also follows that their sex drive is correspondingly much higher than the average man’s and that is why they need an outlet which turns out to be politics. The problem with politics is that we put these big-balled, high-testosterone individuals into positions of power and then expect them to behave like priests.
High sex drives get them into power to roar and can then not allow them to coo like doves. Unless, of course, we give them the vasopressin receptor gene.
Ends
Last edited on Wednesday January 18th, 2006 10:53 by Vubundada_Kandaba
____________________
Runaway Mayhem; Sonja Wanda, the Next Naomi Campbell & the face on London Double Decker Buses, Spring 2004.
____________________
Click here for your Black Profile
|
En Sabah Nur
Villager
| Joined: | Saturday January 7th, 2006 |
| Location: | Where Evil Exists... |
| Posts: | 200 |
| Photo: | |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
Click here for your Black Profile
Search for Black Sites
|
Posted: Wednesday January 18th, 2006 09:19 |
|
The is the premise for this whole thread?
Pease’s book mentions the African Bonobo chimpanzee, which has the largest testicles of all primates and has sex incessantly with every female. But the mighty gorilla, with his relatively small balls, would be lucky to have sex once a year, even though he has his own harem.
This is not a question of monogamy/polygamy but merely sex drive. Neither big balls bonobo or lil balls gorilla is monogamous in this explaination. Clever language and other spurious injections of "examples" mask this. It is a question of drive. Given that the big balled ape had a social construct in which monogamy was learned it is possible to concive it satisfying it's big balled drive with a single female (of sufficiently high drive).
The other examples of castrated animals have been known as long as humans have existed and is nothing new. It's about quality of life. Who wants to live to 120 with no eyes or ears? Why live another 5 - 10 years with no balls and no sex? Pointless statements made to support the poor premise the thread was based on in the first place.
Gave me a good giggle though and no doubt it will give further amusement to an assortment of misandry minded females in residence here.
____________________
____________________
www.blacksearch.co.uk - Helping to promote Black African and Caribbean Websites
|
En Sabah Nur
Villager
| Joined: | Saturday January 7th, 2006 |
| Location: | Where Evil Exists... |
| Posts: | 200 |
| Photo: | |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: | |
Click here for your Black Profile
Search for Black Sites
|
Posted: Wednesday January 18th, 2006 09:33 |
|
Furthermore this whole peiced is couched in unpleasant sexist terminology from a long outdated perspective.
That testosterone is the source of all evil is a fallacy taught to pacifists and hippies.
I chose some choice phrases that allude to the mindset behind this not so funny peice of work.
Men can be kept monogamous with strict rules
I take you to the source of female agony; the philandering man! They mean his balls are the source of female agony?
Generally, testicles are just another part of the male body. Only that, though seemingly hidden and insignificant, they rule this world! Emotive language used to encourage fear of the simple male manhood imbuing it with evil conquering powers. Ridicolous I know...
This means that men produce enough testosterone to encourage them to be promiscuous, but little enough to be kept monogamous with strict rules enforced by women
LOL Surely this was a slip and the author didn't really intend on being THIS open and transparent?
Pease referred to studies of men in mental institutions which showed that castrated men live to an average age of 69, while men left intact with testosterone coursing through their bodies only live to 56 years.
Cut those balls off now!
The same principle applies to your goat, sheep or cow. The point that the man is akin to your animal is surely not lost on you here.
I mean really. I have seen more well thought out propoganda on the S.C.U.M. website.
Seriously though VK I know you said don't shoot the messenger but what about an article about how wayward women need to be controlled by mutilation and chopping off their bits, how female body parts are the ruination of civilisation and we need mens rules to keep them in check like how we do our naughty dogs and pigs.
I mean WTF?? 
This is 2006 my friend. Stuff like this http://www.womynkind.org/scum.htm and your peice just wont do anymore
Last edited on Wednesday January 18th, 2006 09:54 by En Sabah Nur
____________________
____________________
Click here for your Black Profile
|
Vubundada_Kandaba
Villager
Click here for your Black Profile
Search for Black Sites
|
Posted: Wednesday January 18th, 2006 10:49 |
|
En Sabah Nur wrote: Seriously though VK I know you said don't shoot the messenger but what about an article about how wayward women need to be controlled by mutilation and chopping off their bits, how female body parts are the ruination of civilisation and we need mens rules to keep them in check like how we do our naughty dogs and pigs.
I mean WTF?? This is 2006 my friend. Stuff like this http://www.womynkind.org/scum.htm and your peice just wont do anymore
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I get where you are coming from. The article also gave me a good laugh and I had some concerns about it as you do. But nevertheless, we can't keep people like the author from airing their views. The only thing people can do is to challenge the author. I am sure the New Vision newspaper of Uganda does not agree with the author, but as journalist they published it anyway for you can't print only what pleases you and ignore the rest. I just thought of sharing this piece with the villagers. I am only a messen-jah here.
Last edited on Wednesday January 18th, 2006 10:51 by Vubundada_Kandaba
____________________
Runaway Mayhem; Sonja Wanda, the Next Naomi Campbell & the face on London Double Decker Buses, Spring 2004.
____________________
www.blacksearch.co.uk - Helping to promote Black African and Caribbean Websites
|
|
|
Current time is 21:08 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Join the
Blacknet
mailing list
|
|
