Ok but in that corporate level many of us take on expanded positions of the corporation. Not core corporate operations where you can make decision that affect the home and international offices. Yes, you can make a decision but it has to run by so many different operations in the corporation before its given the OK. Not so with core corporate operations.
1980.. 1970.. did not have these 'expanded' position. The 'global' economy with political changes geared towards it made these 'expanded' jobs possible. Not civil rights. Technology was used to 'expand' the economy but is not the basis for it. Politics and security in the form of money to be used within the 'global economy' and domestic priviledges to internationals made what we see today.
Government and corporate intepreted civil rights just helped us get in with the 'home' domestic Western office but does nothing for the international corporate office. I have met many people who went overseas and later regretting their time over there. Things were just some much easier back 'home' office in terms of work and support.
Still I think it is OK for us to be there.
About Indians.
They may hold onto their culture and things but I probably wont have their majority support in matters of civil rights and justice (home issues) under these expanded positions. Their right to be there was most likely not of their own hard won domestic efforts. Geopolitics and corporate politics in India and from the UK during the 1970 and 1980 positioned them there mostly. We are just the last to take fruit in these corporation. And the fruit aint fresh.
Our people are not bad and should not be compared to others as many make out. Once we have our minds on justice and it not only helps us but others too.
The corporate environment just doesn foster that sense.
Last edited on Monday January 22nd, 2007 00:42 by defyfear
____________________
www.blacksearch.co.uk - Helping to promote Black African and Caribbean Websites
|
